The Phoenix Network:
 
 
 
About  |  Advertise
Adult  |  Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures
 
Flashbacks  |  Letters  |  Media -- Dont Quote Me  |  News Features  |  Stark Ravings  |  Talking Politics  |  The Editorial Page

Artists get the shaft

By TED SIEFER  |  February 2, 2009

Critics of the planning process for Fort Point during the past decade might argue that artists haven't had a seat at a round table at all, alongside developers and city officials, but have rather been relegated to the kiddie table, where they are indulged but not taken seriously.

By the turn of this century, billions of dollars had been pumped into the South Boston waterfront area — the Central Artery tunnels, the Silver Line, the Boston Harbor clean-up — and developers were lining up to reap the benefits of Downtown Boston's new frontier, including Menino, with his plans to relocate City Hall to South Boston in tow. At the same time, since the old industrial zoning was being completely rewritten, the BRA should have had considerable leverage in guiding the direction of development. Two years ago, after thousands of hours of planning meetings, the BRA unveiled its "100 Acres" master plan, designating the whole district a Planned Development Area, giving the BRA extraordinary latitude to approve projects on a case-by-case basis. Reflecting the consensus of residents and artists, the BRA laid down core principles for development, including that new projects "be at least one-third residential or artist live/work in character."

Among the signatories to the 100 Acres plan was a real-estate company known, ominously enough, as Archon, a partnership between the Archon Group — a real-estate subsidiary of the Wall Street investment-banking and securities firm Goldman Sachs — and Tony Goldman (no relation), a fancy-pants developer who takes credit for the gentrification of New York's SoHo neighborhood. In a 2006 New York Times article, he described his grand vision to transform Fort Point into "the Wharf District," where high-end condos, boutiques, and galleries would co-exist with edgy artists.

But within a couple years of buying 14 buildings in Fort Point, totaling more than 1.2 million square feet, Archon sold off the bulk of its "portfolio," and most of the development the BRA has signed off on has been for office conversions, a clear violation of the one-third residential component of the envisioned plan. Goldman's partners were more direct in laying out their strategy for Fort Point: obtaining concessions from the BRA and flipping most of the buildings. "Archon's development team is working through the Boston Redevelopment Authority . . . to obtain an additional 500,000 SF of FAR [floor-area ratio] for three of the buildings," its Web site boasts. "Once zoning approval of the additional FAR is complete, these assets will be sold." In other words, while Archon and other developers have touted the cachet artists bring to Fort Point, they have generally treated the real-life artists living there as an impediment to developing or disposing of their assets.

Messages left with Goldman and John Matteson, Archon's regional director of acquisitions, were not returned.

The BRA maintains that it is committed to the 100 Acres plan. Kairos Shen, the BRA's director of planning, notes that the approved projects represent only an early stage in what may eventually comprise six million square feet of development stretching over the whole waterfront area. "Nowhere did we say that residential had to go first," he says. "Much of these plans depend on what financing is available. The 100 acres may take 40 years to build out."

Whether artists will still be around then, of course, is an open question, but the current trajectory doesn't bode well.

"It's a frustrating thing," says Jon Seward, an architect and planner in one of the buildings due to be cleared out. "We're the ones who put up with the squalid conditions. Now that billions have been spent cleaning up the harbor and on the Silver Line, they expect us to dutifully and meekly make our way out through the back door, so the big money can get made."

Seward has been in the neighborhood long enough — nearly 20 years — to remember when Rick James played at the Channel, the local rock club, and when artists, dock workers, and the occasional downtown suits drank together at Lucky's bar.

Seward points out that it's not just artists that called the district home, but scores of arts-related businesses and organizations. One of the nonprofits that was forced out was the Revolving Museum, which put on arts programs for inner-city kids. The museum is now in Lowell. Fort Point was also the nurturing ground and remains the home for many internationally renowned artists. One of them, Harriet Casdin-Silver, a pioneer in holographic art, passed away this past year, not long after being kicked out of her studio. In a measure of the acrimony in the neighborhood these days, Goldman was accused by artists at a community meeting in March of contributing to her death due to stress.

090130_ftPointartists_main
HERE’S THE POINT (Clockwise, from top) Amy MacDonald, Katherine Ahearn (with Wentworth co-op students Pat Ramey and Carla Vasta), Tony Owen, and Stewart Diamond — just a handful of the artists living and working in buildings on A Street that are due to be cleared out under a BRA relocation plan.

Move 'em all out and shake 'em up
Paul Bernstein, the president of the Fort Point Arts Community (FPAC), the neighborhood's main artist-advocacy group, was at that meeting, and many others this past year, imploring city officials to get involved in lease negotiations on behalf of 77 artists whose leases were expiring near the end of November.

< prev  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |   next >
Related: Can Sam Yoon win?, City Hall writes its own report card, Edifice complex, More more >
  Topics: News Features , Fort Point, mayor, Ray Flynn,  More more >
  • Share:
  • RSS feed Rss
  • Email this article to a friend Email
  • Print this article Print
Comments
Re: Artists get the shaft
Why are Artists getting the shaft? I don't understand that headline. I have been working in Boston for the past 23 years, traveling up and down Summer street, A street, Congress street and Mulcher street.I have not seen any improvement by any artist in that area for the entire time in my daily travel up and down streets which have run down warehouses. If Artitsts want a community to work and live at, they should have a better impact to thier community by stimulating their enviroment. For instance, at the corner of Mulcher street and A street.This week I noticed a new painting on an old diner, it's very cool to look at when I drive by(Not done by a Fort Point Artist). I see drawings on the sidewalk in Boston ( International place, Congress street couthouse). If the Artits think they are getting the shaft, and want help from others for thier cause, lets see what you have. Just because they have been at one location does not entitle them for squatters rights. Maybe a development company has ideas for condo's,retail space and restaurants for the area they do not want to vacate, thus stimulating the enviroment. Maybe I will not have to travel the same streets to see no change, with the exception of one painting every 23 years.  
By Patrowolf on 01/29/2009 at 4:53:15
Re: Artists get the shaft
This really is a shamefully unbalanced piece of journalism. At least try to get the facts straight and give the city some credit for all it's done to help preserve the fort point district. The mayor just finalized the creation of the fort point landmarks district, which does more to protect the physical character and fabric of the fort point community than anything the artist community has done without city help. Plus, the assertion that artists never had a seat at the table with the city is outrageous - most of the panel that came up with the landmarks district was composed of artists, with only one developer - the artists got their way all the way, and the mayor supported the landmarking -- some criticism of the goldman folks from NYC is fine but please present both sides of the story in terms of what the city did!!
By Southiewontgo on 01/29/2009 at 7:47:50
Re: Artists get the shaft
Whoever wrote the first comment is a f-ing idiot.  First - most artists in the area are not public-art artists.  Second - the buildings (including the old A Street Diner that you are referring to) are owned and need $$$$ to make public work on - that is why the work by Shepard Fairey is installed there now - completely and 100 percent backed by the ICA.  So please, shut up until you know what you are talking about.  
By artistinresidence on 01/29/2009 at 7:59:54
Re: Artists get the shaft
@ Patrowolf.

You dont understand the headline? Maybe if you would have read the entire article you would have more of a sense of whats going on in the neighborhood. I will also point out, that if you ever got out of your car instead of driving through you would have more of an understanding of the community as well. There have been many artists that have taken great steps to improve the neighborhood. Local artist Ana Crowley owns the Channel Cafe, which is a great spot to eat and a very positive addition to the neighborhood.
There have been artist co-ops that have bought buildings to solidify the space for their work.
The point of this article is that the developers basically either lied about their plans, or abondoned them, both of which were at the expense of an ongoing community. The area is billed as New Englands Largest Artists Community, so its obvioulsy something the city points out or flaunts this for its own best interest, that being said, they should def be held accountable to help protect these tenants from seedy out-of-town investors. BTW, The artists DO have squatting rights, its Mass., so check your laws...But it should not come to that though, not when  promises were made and then broken.
The BRA has done too little too late. If not for the pressure applied by local artists to the mayors office, they would be working(and pretty much are) for the best interests of the developers.The so-called relocation of the Fort Point Artists is a joke, I was in Fort Point and left because of the games that Archon was playing. They are trying to make it as difficult as possible for any artist to feel comfortable staying there right now, even though they supposedly offered two year leases. I have read article after article on this situation and in the end, the Mayors office has done little to regulate the terms and conditions that Archon has supposedly set. The BRA is a joke without a punchline. Its so obvious that its in shambles and the people in charge dont know enough about the communites that they are supposed to support. How long has Kairos Shen had this job? Not very long..thats for sure. It's not his fault, but he's in WAY over his head, and all that adds up to is the artists getting screwed.

Anyway, patrowolf, if you had ever got out of your car, you would have seen multiple art shows a year, open studios, street art sponsored by grants from the city, street art that wasnt sponsored by anyone and true artists living and working amongst each other. You would have seen families, friends and proffessionals. Who knows, you might even have made some new friends.

But instead, you just drove through, not knowing anything about the community, and then you decide to come on this forum and run your uninformed mouth.

oh, and its Melcher St. not Mulcher st.... but you would have known that driving by it ever day.. right?
By flatcolor1 on 01/29/2009 at 8:08:36
Re: Artists get the shaft

Artists were among the first groups to adapt and reuse the buildings in Fort Point when manufacturing moved out. For decades they prevented blight with a 24 hour presence and created a desirable district. If this is not a fact, why would many of the developers use this as a pitch when they are marketing their property?

 

So you’ve never seen any art in Fort Point? Aside from the Open Studios events there have been numerous remarkable public art pieces that have transformed the Fort Point neighborhood. The artists in Fort Point have a long history of collaborating with the Boston Children’s Museum. Fanciful animals once adorned many areas in the Children’s Museum, made with recycle material by former Fort Point artist Melora Kuhn. Lisa Green Field and Jennifer Moses created an unforgettable public art piece when they covered the Summer Street Bridge with sod, turning the side walks and bridge green, lush and surreal with grass.  

Michael Moss and Claudia Ravisher did another amazing piece when they turned the Summer Street Over Pass into a sound installation singing with poetry and music. All activated by cell phones. Ever take your kid to the Children’s Museum? Those two artists made the Musical Chairs exhibit. My kids can’t get enough of it! That’s joy, right out of Fort Point! 

Public art in the channel, foil flyers glittering in every window of every Fort Point building, old salvaged windows transformed into art by a project headed up by the FPCC and hung along the parking lot of the General Mail Facility, pottery mosaics in the side walks, by Danielle Krcmar, hand crafted benches along Summer Street by Fort Point artists, Christina Lanzl and Jeff Heyne,  the small park on A Street adorned with photos by Hally McGehean, a banner glowing along the General mail facility fence by Tom Wojciechowski.  In 30 plus years there has been plenty of art in the Fort Point neighborhood. So much, much more-I’ve left a lot out-so anyone from Fort Point can jump in and add names and art. Since Goldman Sachs has owned the buildings, they’ve tried very hard to pretend that no artists are in Fort Point, there is too long a history and too much wonderful stuff being made there-now if only the City and the BRA would wake up! 

 If you’ve not seen the art in Fort Point, then you just haven’t opened your eyes.

This is what Boston will be missing if greed is allowed to prevail over culture.   

By TeachArt on 01/29/2009 at 8:09:07
Re: Artists get the shaft
 
By ftptpainter on 01/31/2009 at 12:16:50
Re: Artists get the shaft
 
By ftptpainter on 01/31/2009 at 1:42:01
Re: Artists get the shaft
Southiwontgo demands that the reporter "get the facts straight" and then mistates nearly every fact. This one calls out for a clarification: "most of the panel that came up with the landmarks district was composed of artists, with only one developer - the artists got their way all the way, and the mayor supported the landmarking" First of all, of 4 community reps on the study committee and 5 additional commissioners on the committee drafting guidelines, only one member was an artist. The other 3 community reps were one architect, a retail business owner in the district and lastly, a director of a Boston-based non-profit (unrelated to the arts). Second, the artists did not "get there way" with the landmarking. No Fort Point artists or arts organizations weighed in with any particular position over the multi-year process with respect to the district other than registering strong support for protecting the integrity of the historic wharf buildings. The only fact that Southiwontgo gets right is that Mayor Menino supported the Landmark designation. Many members of the arts community have registered public appreciation for his support, and more appreciation for his support (and City Council support) will certainly be forthcoming in weeks and months ahead.
By ftpointer on 02/04/2009 at 8:44:46

THE BEST 2009
Today's Event Picks
ARTICLES BY TED SIEFER
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   CITY HALL WRITES ITS OWN REPORT CARD  |  March 04, 2009
    Seeing through transparency
  •   ARTISTS GET THE SHAFT  |  February 02, 2009
    The city gives Fort Point's creative residents the finger
  •   DIANNE'S SPECIAL DEAL  |  October 29, 2008
    State Senator Dianne Wilkerson already has amassed a list of embarrassing political pratfalls. The Phoenix uncovers two more situations that should cause concern on the cusp of the election.

 See all articles by: TED SIEFER

MOST POPULAR
RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 



  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
thePhoenix.com:
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
Copyright © 2009 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group