The Phoenix Network:
 
 
About  |  Advertise
Adult  |  Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures
 
Books  |  Comedy  |  Dance  |  Museum And Gallery  |  Theater
Nominate-best-2010

2009: Rants of the Right

By DAVID S. BERNSTEIN  |  December 22, 2009

sla

Bernard Goldberg,A Slobbering Love Affair: The True (And Pathetic) Story of the Torrid Romance Between Barack Obama and the Mainstream Media
184 pages, Regnery Press, January 26, 2009
Highest Position Reached on NYT Best Seller List: No. 2
Readability: 5
Digestibility: 1
Crazy Factor: -1
Overall Score: 5

It may be true, as Bernard Goldberg posits, that "supposedly objective reporters" acted en masse "blatantly as full-fledged advocates of one side" in covering the presidential election contest between Barack Obama and John McCain, and that "in 2008, the mainstream media crossed the line" and "were not satisfied merely being partisan witnesses to history."

However, you will find no evidence of it in Goldberg's silly, tendentious book on the topic.

Goldberg must know that he doesn't have the goods. His first concrete examples of journalists abandoning their ethics are attributed to such highly regarded political programs as The Oprah Winfrey Show and The View, which I take as a confession that he couldn't even pretend to find any actual journalists who fit this description.

If indeed the presidential election cycle featured an incredible, blatant bias oozing constantly from purportedly objective journalists, one would imagine the examples would be piled in thick stacks upon the desk of the man who makes his living chronicling that phenomenon. Reporters like the New York Times' Adam Nagourney, CBS News's Cynthia Bowers, CNN's Dana Bash, USA Today's Jill Lawrence, the Associated Press's Beth Fouhy, the Chicago Sun-Times' Lynn Sweet, the Washington Post's Dan Balz, the Los Angeles Times' Peter Wallsten — just to name a few off the top of my head — each filed hundreds of reports during the presidential campaign cycle. Wouldn't you start there, rather than with Whoopie and Winfrey?

Most of the examples of "bias" in ASlobbering Love Affair are of openly opinionated commentators expressing opinions — a practice performed by at least as many Charles Krauthammers and Bill O'Reillys as by Rachel Maddows and Frank Riches. What few specific charges Goldberg makes of straight reporting crossing the line are well-worn, and were widely criticized at the time: the New York Times' insinuation of a McCain affair with a lobbyist, for example, or MSNBC's use of Chris Matthews and Keith Olbermann as election-night anchors.

But the bulk of Goldberg's gripe concerns what the mainstream media allegedly underplayed — namely, William Ayers and Jeremiah Wright. According to the book's index, 43 of its 173 pages discuss "Obama, Barack — alliances with radicals." To me, that says less about the media's coverage than about Goldberg's wildly disproportionate obsession with Ayers and Wright. (A trait he shares with all the other top-selling conservative authors of 2009.)

One would be tempted to take A Slobbering Love Affair as proof that there was no widespread journalistic bias in favor of Obama. But that would give Goldberg too much credit. He did no research for this book; everything in it could have been recited by anyone who regularly watched Fox News and read National Review Online during the campaign. I seriously doubt he so much as held a copy of the Times in his hands during the two-year cycle. The mainstream media may have been slobbering, but Goldberg wasn't paying enough attention to know.

< prev  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |   next >
Related: , , , More more >
  Topics: Books , Michael Dukakis, Barack Obama, Saddam Hussein,  More more >
  • Share:
  • Share this entry with Facebook
  • Share this entry with Digg
  • Share this entry with Delicious
  • RSS feed
  • Email this article to a friend
  • Print this article
HTML Prohibited
Add Comment

Today's Event Picks
ARTICLES BY DAVID S. BERNSTEIN
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   BAY STATE'S TOP LOBBYISTS  |  February 03, 2010
    Nearly everyone in Massachusetts felt the pinch of the recession in 2009 — even Beacon Hill lobbyists had to tighten their belts.
  •   ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM  |  January 27, 2010
    Platoons of state Republicans, energized by Scott Brown's stunning victory over Democrat Martha Coakley last week, are setting their sights on November.
  •   DISASTER, THEN DÉTENTE  |  January 25, 2010
    From the first days after the earthquake struck Haiti — long before anyone knew how dire the situation was, let alone how the US government would respond — pundits were wagging their tongues about the potential political implications. A poor response, they said, would invite comparisons to the Bush administration's bungled handling of Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans.
  •   HOW BROWN WON  |  January 22, 2010
    As the Massachusetts US Senate election unfolded yesterday, all that the pols and pundits wanted to talk about was how Martha Coakley managed to lose the race. And there is plenty there to dissect. But there is another part of the story, and that is how Scott Brown managed to win it.
  •   READY TO RUMBLE  |  January 13, 2010
    Last summer, the upcoming race that got most Bay State politicos salivating was the run for governor.

 See all articles by: DAVID S. BERNSTEIN

MOST POPULAR
RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 



  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
thePhoenix.com:
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
Copyright © 2010 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group