The Phoenix Network:
 
 
About  |  Advertise
Adult  |  Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures
 
FallGuide2009

Newsmax calls for coup, gets cold feet


 

The column in question, by John L. Perry--oddly, an alum of both the LBJ and Carter administrations--has since been taken down. But Josh Marshall of Talking Points Memo has posted it in its entirety.

Of course, as a Phoenix colleague of mine notes, it'll be a *gentle* coup....

(From TPM, via Greg Mitchell.)

-------

Obama Risks a Domestic Military Intervention

By: John L. Perry

There is a remote, although gaining, possibility America's military will intervene as a last resort to resolve the "Obama problem." Don't dismiss it as unrealistic.

America isn't the Third World. If a military coup does occur here it will be civilized. That it has never happened doesn't mean it wont. Describing what may be afoot is not to advocate it. So, view the following through military eyes:

# Officers swear to "support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic." Unlike enlisted personnel, they do not swear to "obey the orders of the president of the United States."

# Top military officers can see the Constitution they are sworn to defend being trampled as American institutions and enterprises are nationalized.

# They can see that Americans are increasingly alarmed that this nation, under President Barack Obama, may not even be recognizable as America by the 2012 election, in which he will surely seek continuation in office.

# They can see that the economy -- ravaged by deficits, taxes, unemployment, and impending inflation -- is financially reliant on foreign lender governments.

# They can see this president waging undeclared war on the intelligence community, without whose rigorous and independent functions the armed services are rendered blind in an ever-more hostile world overseas and at home.

# They can see the dismantling of defenses against missiles targeted at this nation by avowed enemies, even as America's troop strength is allowed to sag.

# They can see the horror of major warfare erupting simultaneously in two, and possibly three, far-flung theaters before America can react in time.

# They can see the nation's safety and their own military establishments and honor placed in jeopardy as never before.

So, if you are one of those observant military professionals, what do you do?

Wait until this president bungles into losing the war in Afghanistan, and Pakistan's arsenal of nuclear bombs falls into the hands of militant Islam?

Wait until Israel is forced to launch air strikes on Iran's nuclear-bomb plants, and the Middle East explodes, destabilizing or subjugating the Free World?

What happens if the generals Obama sent to win the Afghan war are told by this president (who now says, "I'm not interested in victory") that they will be denied troops they must have to win? Do they follow orders they cannot carry out, consistent with their oath of duty? Do they resign en masse?

Or do they soldier on, hoping the 2010 congressional elections will reverse the situation? Do they dare gamble the national survival on such political whims?

Anyone who imagines that those thoughts are not weighing heavily on the intellect and conscience of America's military leadership is lost in a fool's fog.

Will the day come when patriotic general and flag officers sit down with the president, or with those who control him, and work out the national equivalent of a "family intervention," with some form of limited, shared responsibility?

Imagine a bloodless coup to restore and defend the Constitution through an interim administration that would do the serious business of governing and defending the nation. Skilled, military-trained, nation-builders would replace accountability-challenged, radical-left commissars. Having bonded with his twin teleprompters, the president would be detailed for ceremonial speech-making.

Military intervention is what Obama's exponentially accelerating agenda for "fundamental change" toward a Marxist state is inviting upon America. A coup is not an ideal option, but Obama's radical ideal is not acceptable or reversible.

Unthinkable? Then think up an alternative, non-violent solution to the Obama problem. Just don't shrug and say, "We can always worry about that later."

In the 2008 election, that was the wistful, self-indulgent, indifferent reliance on abnegation of personal responsibility that has sunk the nation into this morass.

 

 

  • Share:
  • Share this entry with Facebook
  • Share this entry with Digg
  • Share this entry with Delicious
  • Email this article to a friend
  • Print this article

2 Comments

  • Al said:

    As stated by Abraham Lincoln, "The people are the masters of both Congress and the Courts, not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men that pervert it"

    Additionally in the Declaration of Independance, "But when a long train of abuses and usurpations pursuing invariably...a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty to throw off such Government, and to provide new guards for their future security"

    September 30, 2009 9:00 PM
  • Adam said:

    Al, for the record, Lincoln's remarks--of which you've excerpted part--were made not to endorse the overthrow of a popularly elected president, but in reference to not allowing the extension of slavery:  //tr.im/Ahxc

    As for Part II of your comments, I'm curious: what "abuses and usurpations" have you experienced in the Obama Administration, and what is the nature of the "absolute Despotism" you anticipate?

    September 30, 2009 9:50 PM

Leave a Comment

Login | Not a member yet? Click here to Join

(required)  
(optional)
(required)  
Follow the Boston Phoenix
twitter facebook myspace youtube rss
All Blogs
more by Adam Reilly
Philadelphia Story | October 02, 2009
Pagliuca and the B-word | September 18, 2009
Menino's junked mail | September 18, 2009
Boston.com gets a new sports editor | September 16, 2009
New in the Phoenix: The Globe shakes up the mayor's race | September 16, 2009

 See all articles by: Adam Reilly

ADVERTISEMENT
Latest Comments
Q&A #4 -- Coakley And Emailgate - Reporters that cover City Hall need to file more public records and sunshine open public meetings appeals...

By don warner saklad on 10-02-2009 in Talking Politics

Q&A #7 -- Balser vs. Warren - I don't know...I live in Newton and people are hungry for change, which plays to Warren's advantage....

By Steve on 10-02-2009 in Talking Politics

From Kayne's blog: Five reasons the Kanye West/Lady Gaga tour got cancelled - I think kanye is being Punished 4 speaking out Against the politics that Surround award shows it had...

By jasonlee on 10-02-2009 in Phlog

From Kayne's blog: Five reasons the Kanye West/Lady Gaga tour got cancelled - I think you,ll should back the fuck up off him.He fucked up,its over, let the shit go.And if anything...

By JW on 10-02-2009 in Phlog

Ask Me Anything Friday, 10/2 - Do you think that Flaherty really sold the Floon concept last night?

By Foxed on 10-02-2009 in Talking Politics

Latest Comments from Dont Quote Me
Most Viewed
@KayHanley at T.T.'s Tonight, or How To Use Twitter To Guarantee We'll Plug Your Show
The Bon Savants blog their Rock Band Network experience
HOMEWORK: Assignment #1: Pretty and Nice's "Massive U"
Brian Carpenter, of Beat Circus: Top 5 Songs For A Jealous Man ...
MP3s: The Grand Ole Hoot
Trent Reznor to Interscope: "Fuck you. Take that beat and shove it up Timbaland’s ass"
MP3 of the Week: The Lights Out, "Gottagetouttahere"
Most Viewed from Dont Quote Me
Friday, October 02, 2009  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
thePhoenix.com:
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
Copyright © 2009 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group